By Eric Snyder, Director, Product Management, New York Life Investments
The economic uncertainty ignited by the coronavirus outbreak sparked a flight to quality and unparalleled levels of cash flowing out of risk assets and into bank accounts, CDs and money market funds. Many investors, fearful of the impact of market volatility, chose to sacrifice return for asset classes that they believed provided a safe haven in the current environment. As many investors start to get off the sidelines and back into assets with greater return potential, it’s our perspective that these investors can find an optimal risk-return balance in short-term municipal bonds.
The cash conundrum: cash assets going up, and yields going lower
This year’s shift to cash and other safe-haven assets has been dramatic. FDIC data shows that $2 trillion has been deposited into bank accounts since January. In April alone, bank deposits grew by $865 billion, a number that eclipses cash deposits in any previous year.1 According to Morningstar, investors also poured more than $1.1 trillion into taxable money market funds this year.2 At the end of May, taxable money market fund assets ballooned to nearly $4.6 trillion, a $1.6 trillion increase compared to a year prior.3
This rush to safety occurred even as the Fed lowered the federal funds rate down to a range of 0% to 0.25% on March 16. This, of course, occurred as the impact of the pandemic was becoming clearer and de-risking in the financial markets was already underway.
While aimed at stabilizing the economy, the Fed’s actions also lowered yields on bank deposit accounts, CDs and money market funds. As investors began shifting money into these low-risk assets, rates of return were dropping, making it increasingly difficult for investors to find meaningful returns in the short-term markets.
Figure 1: CD and Money Market yields are near-zero
Average yield (%)
Source: FRED, Morningstar, as of 6/22/2020. Based on national average rates. Jumbo Deposits are deposits of at least $100,000.
Moreover, the Fed has made the future of the rate environment very clear, as evidenced by Chair Powell’s statement following the June FOMC meeting: “We’re not thinking about raising rates. We’re not even thinking about thinking about raising rates.”4 With the unlikelihood of moving beyond near-zero rates before 2023, investors are adjusting expectations, as they should.
Figure 2: Short-term interest rates are projected to be near-zero through the end of 2022
FOMC Members’ Federal Funds Rate Dot Projections
Source: Bloomberg, as of 6/10/2020. The dot plot denotes FOMC projections for future interest rates in the subsequent years and in the longer run. Each member is represented by one dot.
Why short-term munis now?
The velocity of the municipal sell-off in March was the worst in decades. However, it’s important to note that many short-term and ultrashort bond funds also did not meet investor expectations during the height of the volatility. These asset classes are often viewed as a notch-up the risk spectrum from cash, CDs and money market funds, but they performed poorly throughout the March volatility.
Figure 3: Investors may have been disappointed by the average Short-Term Bond Fund or Ultrashort Bond Fund
March 2020 Total Return (%)
Source: Morningstar, as of 3/31/2020. Past performance is no guarantee of future results, which will vary.
By comparison, three-year short-term investment-grade municipal bonds (short-term municipals) offered more limited downside participation in March 2020, returning -1.37%, not adjusted for taxes. When adjusting for the tax benefit, that return increases to -1.06%, representing outperformance of +226 bps and +120 bps over the average taxable short-term bond fund and average ultrashort bond fund, respectively.5 Even the average short-term municipal mutual fund, as represented by the Morningstar Muni National Short category, fared better in March, posting a return of -1.59% (not adjusted for taxes.). These results aren’t surprising when taking into account the key traits of short-term municipal bonds.
- Short-term municipal bonds have historically had low volatility. This can be attributed to the minimal credit risk inherent in these securities, especially when compared to global short-term corporates. For example, the three-year average cumulative default rate for investment-grade municipals from 1970-2018 was 0.02%, while investment-grade corporates had a 0.42% default rate. In other words, corporates had a 21x greater chance of defaulting compared to municipals.6
- Additionally, the muni market has historically skewed toward the highest credit ratings. In 2018, roughly 92% of Moody’s-rated municipal credits were rated A or higher. At the end of that year, the median municipal rating was Aa3, while the median rating for global corporates was Baa3.7
Figure 4: Municipals rarely defaulted, especially relative to short-term corporate bonds
Source: Moody’s Investors Service, US Municipal Bond Defaults and Recoveries, 1970-2018.
While some investors may be overlooking the benefits of an allocation to short-term munis in this environment, we believe that, when considering the yield per unit of risk, munis provide the best “bang for the buck” over short and ultrashort corporate bond alternatives.
Why is this the case? Well, short-term corporates and government securities are widely held in short-term and ultrashort bond portfolios (the combined average exposures for the Morningstar Short-Term Bond Category and Morningstar Ultrashort Bond Category were 63% and 47%, respectively, as of 5/31/2020). Accounting for the tax benefit of municipal bonds, short-term municipal bonds have a yield of 1.2%, which currently exceeds both short-term corporate bonds (1.0% yield) and short-term government bonds (0.2% yield). From a relative volatility perspective, short-term municipal bonds fall between corporates and governments.8 We pointed out above that corporate bonds carry more historical credit risk, but what about government bonds?
Looking under the hood of the Short-Term Government Bond Index, you’ll see it is composed mainly of AAA-rated U.S. Treasuries (approximately 95%), with interest and principal payments backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. So, while short-term government securities have very low volatility, they are also very sensitive to market interest rates, and even a slight uptick in rates could wipe out a year or more of coupon income. Thus, the government sector could be the most challenged of the three in a rising interest rate environment. This is why the short-term municipal asset class currently offers the best yield per unit of risk taken.
Figure 5: Short-term municipals offer the best yield-per-unit of risk versus key short-term fixed-income sectors
Source: Bloomberg Barclays, as of 6/22/20. Tax-equivalent yield is based on the highest tax rate of 40.80% (37% tax bracket plus 3.80% for Medicare surcharge), and volatility is represented by standard deviation over the 5-year period ending 3/31/20. Short-term corporate bonds are represented by BBgBarc US Corp 1-3 Yr. TR USD; Short-term government bonds are represented by BBgBarc US Govt 1-3 Yr. TR USD. Yields are yield to worst. Risk is represented by standard deviation. Past performance is no guarantee of future results, which will vary. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
So, what exactly does all of this mean for investors going forward? Well, first and foremost, it is clear that investors should be giving more consideration to short-term municipal bonds as a solution for stepping out of cash. Yields on certificates of deposit and money market accounts and funds are near-zero and the typical asset classes for the job (i.e., short-term taxable bond sectors) currently lack the risk-return balance that investors may want in this type of allocation.
Short-term municipal bonds, however, provide high credit quality with lower credit risk compared to taxable corporate bonds. We continue to believe that municipal bonds should be part of a diversified asset allocation, and that the current environment has made active management more important than ever. By taking advantage of the price weaknesses, rate changes and market dislocations, active muni bond managers remain best positioned to outperform during these extraordinary market conditions.
- Short-term municipals represented by Bloomberg Barclays Municipal 3-Year Index. Tax-adjusted return based on an equally weighted national average federal and state (top bracket) income tax rate for single filers (37% federal, plus 3.8% net investment income tax, plus 6.31% state average).
- Source: Moody’s US Municipal Bond Defaults and Recoveries, 1970-2018
- Source: Moody’s US Municipal Bond Defaults and Recoveries, 1970-2018
- Short-term municipals: Bloomberg Barclays Municipal 3-Year Index; short-term corporates: Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate 1-3 Year Index; short-term government: Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Government 1-3 Year Index. Volatility is represented by 5-year standard deviation from May 31, 2015 – May 31, 2020. Past performance is no guarantee of future results, which will vary. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
Credit Ratings: Moody’s rates borrowers on a scale from Aaa through C. Aaa through Baa3 represent investment grade, while Ba1 through C represent non-investment grade. Standard & Poor’s rates borrowers on a scale from AAA to D. AAA through BBB represent investment grade, while BB through D represent non-investment grade. Fitch rates borrowers on a scale from AAA to D. AAA to BBB represent investment grade, while BB through D represent non-investment grade.
Standard deviation measures how widely dispersed returns have been over a specific period of time. A high standard deviation indicates that the range is wide, implying greater potential for volatility.
Tax-equivalent yield is the yield that would be required on a taxable security to provide the same yield after taxes as is provided by a tax-exempt municipal bond. The higher a person’s tax bracket is, the higher the tax-equivalent yield will be. Tax-equivalent yield is often used when evaluating municipal bonds.
Yield to Worst: An estimate of the lowest yield that you can expect to earn from a bond when holding to maturity, absent a default. It is a measure that is used in place of yield to maturity with callable bonds. As callable bonds can be bought back before their stated maturity date, yield to maturity does not provide an accurate picture of what an investor can expect to earn.
Treasury Securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government as to payment of principal and interest if held to maturity. Interest income on these securities is exempt from state and local taxes.
This material represents an assessment of the market environment as at a specific date, is subject to change and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding the funds or any issuer or security in particular.
The strategies discussed are strictly for illustrative and educational purposes and are not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. There is no guarantee that any strategies discussed will be effective. This material contains general information only and does not take into account an individual’s financial circumstances. This information should not be relied upon as a primary basis for an investment decision. Rather, an assessment should be made as to whether the information is appropriate in individual circumstances, and consideration should be given to talking to a financial advisor before making an investment decision.
Municipal bond risks include the ability of the issuer to repay the obligation, the relative lack of information about certain issuers, and the possibility of future tax and legislative changes, which could affect the market for and value of municipal securities. A portion of a fund’s income may be subject to state and local taxes or the alternative minimum tax. Income from municipal bonds held by a fund could be declared taxable because of unfavorable changes in tax law, adverse interpretations by the Internal Revenue Service or state tax authorities, or noncompliant conduct of a bond issuer. High-yield municipal bonds may be subject to increased liquidity risk as compared to other high-yield debt securities. Bonds are subject to interest-rate risk and can lose principal value when interest rates rise. Bonds are also subject to credit risk, in which the bond issuer may fail to pay interest and principal in a timely manner.
Neither New York Life Investment Management LLC, nor its affiliates or representatives provide tax, legal or accounting advice. Please contact your own professionals.
“New York Life Investments” is both a service mark, and the common trade name, of certain investment advisors affiliated with New York Life Insurance Company. Securities are distributed by NYLIFE Distributors LLC, 30 Hudson Street, Jersey City, NJ 07302. NYLIFE Distributors LLC is a Member FINRA/SIPC. © 2020 New York Life Investment Management LLC. All rights reserved.
newETFs.io respects the hard work of others and gives all credit to the remarkable folks at ETFTrends.com. This excerpt/article was pulled from their RSS feed; click here to view the original. Please note that on occasion, the RSS feed will not have the author. When this happens this site defaults the author to "News". Make no mistake, this excerpt/article was not created by newETFs.io, it was simply shared with you.