Home etftrends.com Pitfalls Of Esoteric ETF Investing, Or Bye-Bye GHII

Pitfalls Of Esoteric ETF Investing, Or Bye-Bye GHII

Advertisement
Digital Marketing & Website Design for ETFs

By George Fisher

  • The list of “Zombie ETFs” grows with 2.5x more liquidations than during the Great Financial Crisis of 2008 and 2009.
  • The growing availability of low-, no- or negative-fee ETFs is putting pressure on low AUM products and liquidations will become more prevalent.
  • However, their investment value remains the same – overall diversification in difficult to reproduce portfolios.

Last week, Invesco (IVZ) announced it was closing 42 ETFs and will merge an additional 27 into existing ETFs, with the last trading day for these 69 investment products being Feb 14, 2020. In addition, the investment strategy is changing for four additional ETFs.

Known by some as “Zombie ETFs,” this year will mark the highest number of liquidations since the ETF popularity blossomed in the mid-2000s. The number of funds Invesco closed in the first 6 months of 2019 and the number of closures announced last week are almost 2 1/2 times the total number of funds closed in 2008 and 2009, at the height of the last financial crisis.

Low trading volume combined with low assets under management could create a “Zombie ETF.” According to a July 2019 article in Investment News, the culprit in the wave of ETF closures is one of simple economics. With the trend towards very low, or no, fee investments, coupled with the transparency of such, and investors rightfully focusing on investment cost issues, high cost and low volume ETFs are vulnerable to the accountant’s ax. It is a basic law of Economics 101 – during times of profit compression, weaker players fall by the wayside.

Forget low-fee or no-fee ETFs. Salt Financial offers a product with a rebate of $0.50 per $1,000 invested until April 2020, then fees move to 0.29%. Last May, the SEC approved the first ever “negative fee” formula for a singular ETF sponsored by Salt. Last May, the SEC approved the first ever “negative fee” formula for a singular ETF sponsored by Salt. Privately-held Salt describes the promotion on their website as:

*The Adviser has contractually agreed to waive the Fund’s full unitary management fee of 0.29% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on the first $100 million in net assets until at least May 31, 2020 (the “Fee Waiver”) and to contribute to the Fund’s assets an amount equal to an annual rate of 0.05% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on the first $100 million in net assets.

Known as the Salt truBeta US Market Fund (LSLT), the ETF has a Morningstar style box of Large Cap Value, with 55% of assets in the Consumer Defensive, Real Estate, and Utility sectors, and a portfolio comprising of 99 positions. With assets currently just shy of $10 million and most financial advisers preferring ETFs with assets in excess of $100 million, it is not difficult to visualize the intended prospect of the promotion – retail DIY investors.

newETFs.io respects the hard work of others and gives all credit to the remarkable folks at ETFTrends.com. This excerpt/article was pulled from their RSS feed; click here to view the original. Please note that on occasion, the RSS feed will not have the author. When this happens this site defaults the author to "News". Make no mistake, this excerpt/article was not created by newETFs.io, it was simply shared with you.