In an ever-changing interest rate environment, keeping tabs on the numerous corners of the yield market can be difficult. To help investors stay informed, we offer monthly commentary on income investing, covering the latest news, trends and investment opportunities. This month, in celebration of Earth Day, we highlight green bonds.
This year, Earth Day marks not only the annual demonstration of support for environmental protections, but also the fifth anniversary of the signing of the Paris Agreement by the U.S., China and 120 other countries. That milestone established the global target of limiting warming to within 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels through a rapid and dramatic decline in greenhouse gases. With massive amounts of infrastructure investment needed to achieve that goal, green bonds have emerged as an important financing mechanism to direct capital towards Paris-aligned projects.
Green bonds allow investors with tools to build sustainable core fixed income portfolios without significantly impacting risk and return, and leverage the vast size and diversity of the global debt markets to help achieve global climate objectives. A framework to evaluate green bonds that uses the Paris Agreement objectives as its foundation to identify projects with a role in a net-zero carbon economy can help investors have confidence that their income portfolios are also making a positive impact.
Green Bond Market Growth Continues
The green bond market has started off strongly this year, with issuance of over $100 billion already through mid-April, putting the market on track for another record-breaking year in terms of issuance. Compared to last year, the increase in corporate issuance has been notable, making up about 50% of total issuance. This is perhaps unsurprising in the context of the numerous corporate “net-zero” commitments and increased pressure from investors to address climate risks.
Green Bond Issuance Continues to Hit New Records
Source: Climate Bonds Initiative as of 4/16/2021
In addition, a global policy framework is emerging that aims to enhance transparency around climate risks so that investors can identify climate risks and direct capital in a way that aligns with their own sustainability objectives. In the U.S., the SEC has announced that it will update guidance on corporate climate risk disclosure requirements, and the European Union is implementing new sustainability risk disclosure requirements for companies and asset managers while also finalizing a green taxonomy. The outcome from greater transparency and more reliable and consistent climate-related data may be a stronger flow of capital towards green investments.
At the same time, fiscal spending appears poised to increase and will align with global climate objectives. Focus in the U.S. is now on an infrastructure bill that aims to “build back better,” to fix and update existing infrastructure in a way that helps advance the goal of achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. Global central banks are also taking action, and fixed income markets in particular are watching closely. Just days after Biden’s electoral win, the Federal Reserve (Fed) announced that it had joined a global organization of central banks working towards sharing best practices on climate risk management and mobilizing capital to support the climate transition. The Fed also created a new supervision committee on climate, headed by one of the co-chairs of the Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). This organization was established by the Financial Stability Board and is focused on enhancing the disclosure of material financial information related to climate so that the marketplace can better identify risks and opportunities.
50 Shades of Green
Investor demand for sustainable fixed income has rapidly increased. Inflows into sustainable fixed income ETFs in the U.S. alone totaled $2.2 billion in 2020, almost four times the total inflows of the prior three years combined. Within fixed income investing, investors now have greater choice in terms of how to structure their portfolios to align with their sustainability objectives. There is growing differentiation in terms of “how green” different bonds are and whether an investment is aligned with a net-zero economy already, versus those which may be part of a transition towards that objective. The growing number of approaches and labels can cause some confusion. We believe that green bonds will be particularly attractive to a growing base of issuers and investors due to their simplicity, as well as the transparency and impact they can provide, particularly for those seeking “darker” green investments that are aligned with a long-term, net-zero emissions global economy.
A Paris-Aligned Framework for Evaluating Green Bonds
To have confidence in this alignment, however, there needs to be a robust evaluation of the projects financed. We believe the Climate Bonds Initiative’s (CBI) process of reviewing issuance and designating certain bonds as “green” can provide investors with confidence that their green bond portfolio is truly “green”. This process is the foundation of the S&P Green Bond U.S. Dollar Select Index.
The CBI, a global non-profit working to mobilize debt markets for climate solutions, reviews all available information for a given bond issuance to determine whether the proceeds will be used to finance projects or activities that are aligned with their taxonomy. The CBI taxonomy is an extensive list of assets and projects that are needed under the 2-degree warming target established under the Paris Agreement. In particular, the projects are aligned with the goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 50% by 2030 and achieving net-zero emissions by 2050. The taxonomy is grounded in the latest climate science and research from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the International Energy Agency, as well as the input of hundreds of technical experts from around the world. It has been developed through an extensive multi-stakeholder approach and is updated regularly based on new climate research and to capture new technologies. This taxonomy has, in our opinion, become the de facto global standard to define green projects and assets.
The CBI’s taxonomy covers projects across eight broad categories. Some projects are automatically eligible for a green bond designation, while others must pass certain screens to be eligible. For example, an offshore wind farm is generally automatically eligible. An onshore windfarm will also be eligible, but only if no more than 15% of the facility’s electricity usage is generated from non-renewable sources. Certain projects are compared against local baselines. For example, financing of green building construction must rank within the top 15% by emissions performance within their local market to be eligible. The taxonomy also has exclusions, such as “clean coal” or more efficient marine transport to transport coal or oil. There are also several areas where more research is needed to determine how to make a project 2-degree compliant, such as hydrogen fuel production. If there is not enough information for the CBI to make a determination or if less than 95% of the proceeds of a bond go towards a climate-aligned project or activity, then the bond is not eligible to be designated as green, and therefore not eligible for inclusion in the S&P Green Bond U.S. Dollar Select Index.
The Climate Bond Initiative Taxonomy Overview
Source: Climate Bonds Initiative
The Transition to Net-Zero
We believe the CBI taxonomy provides investors with confidence and clarity that their investment is financing projects that have a place in the transition to net-zero carbon and beyond. While capital must flow immediately to these types of projects, there has been growing attention on the transition towards 2050. Certain activities, such as electricity generation from coal, have no role in a net-zero world, and capital spending should be focused on remediation or decommissioning. But such spending would not be considered “green” by most investors.
There are also activities that can help to transition the world from “brown to green” but may not play a role past that. An example is “blue” hydrogen production which is heavily dependent on natural gas and therefore produces a high emissions footprint until zero-carbon “green” hydrogen production is viable. Investment in transition-related projects should not lock in a dependency on fossil fuels. For example, natural gas powered electricity generation with carbon capture may be a viable transition investment given the relatively short lifespan of these assets (15-20 years). However, because leakage of greenhouse gases cannot be fully curbed, these assets would not have a longer-term role and would not be eligible for a “green bond” designation by the CBI.
A Growing Sustainable Bond Ecosystem
Given the important role that transition-related companies and projects will play in getting the world to net-zero, there has been growing focus on a “transition” label to distinguish these investments from the “green” label that projects with longer-term roles to play are given. Many investors may choose to participate in financing the transition, and a pure green bond strategy may be “too forward looking” in that respect and provide exposure to a different set of issuers.
Another growing part of the sustainable fixed income market has been “sustainability bonds.” For these bonds, issuers do not earmark proceeds for specific projects but instead must satisfy broader ESG-related key performance indicators (KPIs) or otherwise pay a higher coupon. These bonds may provide issuers with greater flexibility outside of the CBI taxonomy, and might appeal to a company without a large green project pipeline. While not necessarily inconsistent with green investment, these types of bonds may be harder to align with a 2050 net-zero pathway and provide investors with little insight into how issuers actually achieve goals. There may also be difficulty measuring or monitoring the KPIs in a standardized way. Nevertheless, this area of the market has seen increased issuance and is worth watching.
Other sustainable bond investors may prefer an approach that focuses on the issuer rather than individual bond issue. A “brown” company can, after all, issue a “green” bond if the project financed is aligned with the taxonomy. The green bond structure naturally allows for forward-looking investment to bring non-Paris aligned companies into the net-zero economy, and many investors find that to be an appealing aspect. Other investors prefer to take broader environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into account and might screen investments by the issuer’s ESG score. We believe such an approach requires a more subjective assessment and may rely too heavily on backwards looking data or a company’s own reporting, and also may not provide the transparency and impact that many investors seek. However, as ESG data continues to evolve, these strategies also have a role to play in the sustainable fixed income space.
Interestingly, although green bonds are focused on the projects financed rather than the issuer, the universe of green bond issuers, perhaps unsurprisingly, generally compares favorably from an ESG perspective versus the broader fixed income space in terms of not only environmental, but also social and governance risks. Issuers also tend to be less involved in major ESG-related controversies. Green bond issuance can signal a firm’s commitment to ESG priorities, and the broad green bond market includes issuers who are proactively addressing climate risk. We believe ESG scores generally reflect these dynamics.
|VanEck Vectors® Green Bond ETF (GRNB)||22.06||3.09||6.13||5.68||3.15|
|All Sustainable Bond ETF||Avg||22.05||4.05||8.77||6.93||5.46|
|All Fixed Income (ETF & MF)||Avg||25.68||4.48||9.92||7.56||10.40|
Source: Morningstar as of 1/31/2021. Sustainability Score measures the degree to which a company’s economic value may be at risk driven by ESG factors and is rendered on a 0-100 scale, where lower scores are better, using an asset-weighted average of all covered securities. Environmental Risk, Social Risk and Governance Risk scores measure the degree to which a company’s economic value may be at risk driven by environmental, social or governance risk factors after taking into account a company’s management of such risks and are rendered on a 0-100 scale, where lower scores are better. % High/Severe Controversy represents the market value weight of a portfolio in which the issuer is involved in controversies rated high or severe.
ESG Investing: Not One Size Fits All
Ultimately, the emergence of different approaches to sustainable investing is a positive development for sustainable fixed income investors. It indicates the ongoing development of a large and liquid climate related bond market, which is itself part of the broader sustainable finance ecosystem. There is no “one size fits all” in the world of ESG investing, and there is room within a diversified fixed income portfolio for multiple approaches. Greater choice and differentiated approaches will help to attract more capital and help investors structure a portfolio aligned with their risk/return and sustainability objectives. As climate risks become more understood and incorporated into asset pricing, we expect that green bonds, transition bonds and sustainability bonds may all reflect varying degrees of risk and reward.
Reducing the friction cost of information gathering is crucial to attract more capital, and tools like the CBI taxonomy are crucial in that regard. Common definitions and market-accepted labels provide confidence and clarity to both investors and issuers, helping to attract more investment into the space. We believe the transparency, simplicity and objectivity of the use of proceeds approach will continue to find growing appeal in the marketplace, and believe that green bonds provide fixed income investors with a way to invest in the transition to a net-zero carbon economy and beyond.
Originally published by VanEck, 4/22/21
1 Source: Climate Bonds Initiative, as of 4/16/2021.
2 Source: Morningstar as of 3/31/2021.
This is not an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any of the securities mentioned herein. The information presented does not involve the rendering of personalized investment, financial, legal, or tax advice. Certain statements contained herein may constitute projections, forecasts and other forward looking statements, which do not reflect actual results, are valid as of the date of this communication and subject to change without notice. Information provided by third party sources are believed to be reliable and have not been independently verified for accuracy or completeness and cannot be guaranteed. The information herein represents the opinion of the author(s), but not necessarily those of VanEck.
An investment in the Fund may be subject to risks which include, among others, green bonds, investing in Asian, Chinese and emerging market issuers, foreign securities, foreign currency, credit, interest rate, floating rate, floating rate LIBOR, high yield securities, supranational bond, government-related bond, restricted securities, securitized/asset-backed securities, financial, utilities, market, operational, call, sampling, index tracking, authorized participant concentration, no guarantee of active trading market, trading issues, passive management, fund shares trading, premium/discount risk and liquidity of fund shares, non-diversified and concentration risks, all of which may adversely affect the Fund.
The S&P Green Bond U.S. Dollar Select Index (the “Index”) is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC or its affiliates (“SPDJI”). Standard & Poor’s® and S&P® are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“S&P”) and Dow Jones® is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC (“Dow Jones”). VanEck Vectors Green Bond ETF (the “Fund”) is not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by SPDJI, Dow Jones, S&P, any of their respective affiliates (collectively, “S&P Dow Jones Indices”). Neither S&P Dow Jones Indices make any representation or warranty, express or implied, to the owners of the Fund or any member of the public regarding the advisability of investing in securities generally or in the Fund particularly or the ability of the Index to track general market performance. S&P Dow Jones Indices only relationship to Van Eck Associates Corporation (“VanEck”) with respect to the Index is the licensing of the Index and certain trademarks, service marks and/or trade names of S&P Dow Jones Indices and/or its licensors. The Index is determined, composed and calculated by S&P Dow Jones Indices without regard to VanEck or the Fund. S&P Dow Jones Indices has no obligation to take the needs of VanEck or the owners of the Fund into consideration in determining, composing or calculating the Index. S&P Dow Jones Indices is not responsible for and has not participated in the determination of the prices, and amount of the Fund or the timing of the issuance or sale of the Fund or in the determination or calculation of the equation by which the Fund is to be converted into cash, surrendered or redeemed, as the case may be. S&P Dow Jones Indices have no obligation or liability in connection with the administration, marketing or trading of the Fund. There is no assurance that investment products based on the Index will accurately track index performance or provide positive investment returns. S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC is not an investment advisor. Inclusion of a security within an index is not a recommendation by S&P Dow Jones Indices to buy, sell, or hold such security, nor is it considered to be investment advice.
The S&P 500 Index is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and/or its affiliates and has been licensed for use by Van Eck Associates Corporation. Copyright © 2018 S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a division of S&P Global, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Redistribution or reproduction in whole or in part are prohibited without written permission of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC. For more information on any of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC’s indices please visit www.spdji.com. S&P® is a registered trademark of S&P Global and Dow Jones® is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC. Neither S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC, their affiliates nor their third party licensors make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the ability of any index to accurately represent the asset class or market sector that it purports to represent and neither S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC, their affiliates nor their third party licensors shall have any liability for any errors, omissions, or interruptions of any index or the data included therein.
Investing involves substantial risk and high volatility, including possible loss of principal. An investor should consider the investment objective, risks, charges and expenses of a Fund carefully before investing. To obtain a prospectus and summary prospectus, which contain this and other information, call 800.826.2333 or visit vaneck/etf.com. Please read the prospectus and summary prospectus carefully before investing.
newETFs.io respects the hard work of others and gives all credit to the remarkable folks at ETFTrends.com. This excerpt/article was pulled from their RSS feed; click here to view the original. Please note that on occasion, the RSS feed will not have the author. When this happens this site defaults the author to "News". Make no mistake, this excerpt/article was not created by newETFs.io, it was simply shared with you.